Why John Wayne Refused To Work With Clint Eastwood

Advertisement

Throughout cinematic history, two actors stand heads and tails above everyone else regarding Westerns. Those two men are John Wayne and Clint Eastwood. Throughout their heralded careers, the two men never worked together, even though they were once offered the opportunity to do so. Instead, politics, ego, and machismo got in the way.

The truth is that Clint Eastwood and John Wayne did not get along. The reasons for this are varied and complicated. Neither man was a fan of the other, and John Wayne certainly felt a certain way when he realized that Clint Eastwood was slowly replacing him as America’s favorite cowboy. As Eastwood’s star continued to rise during the reinvention of the Western in the 1960s, Wayne grew increasingly bitter. He condemned the genre’s evolution, refused to acknowledge its newfound popularity, and terminated the one chance both men had to work together.

This article was updated on November 13, 2024, by Christopher Raley: John Wayne and Clint Eastwood are two of the most iconic names in the film industry. They represent different ideals of the Old West and those ideals created a big divide between the actors. More details about Wayne and Eastwood’s rivalry were added to this article, and it was updated to conform to CBR’s current publishing standards.

The Two Cowboys Were Riding In Opposite Directions

One Was a Hero And the Other Was an Anti-Hero

When Clint Eastwood emerged as one of America’s most promising new movie stars in the 1960s, John Wayne’s glory days were already fading. Outside of his Academy Award win for True Grit in 1970, the man known as the Duke could only sit and watch as the type of roles he used to book went to actors younger than him. Clint Eastwood was just such a talented actor who embodied the new aesthetic of the Western.

After debuting on the hit television series Rawhide, Clint Eastwood became one of Hollywood’s most bankable actors thanks to his star-making turn in Sergio Leone’s A Fistful of Dollars. That, in turn, led to the completion of the Dollars trilogy, which resulted in Eastwood’s being hired for a role that John Wayne had infamously turned down, “Dirty” Harry Callahan.

The two actors represented two very different views of the Western. Wayne had always portrayed the upstanding hero whose conflict centered around doing the right thing in complicated situations. On the other hand, Eastwood represented, in many ways, the opposite archetype—the anti-hero. He played the cowboy who was just a few shades away from behind a criminal himself. He didn’t care about the right thing to do as much as he cared about the right thing for him.

Eastwood’s Popularity Frustrated Wayne

He Saw Eastwood As Degrading Cinema

Thanks to the incredible success of the Dirty Harry franchise across five feature films, Eastwood became a new type of cultural icon — one who personified more of a modern-day antihero than the classical man of honor that John Wayne used to portray. As Eastwood’s career progressed, he perfected something John Wayne never entirely succeeded: directing.

He helmed (and starred in) movies like High Plains Drifter and The Outlaw Josey Wales. The disconnect between the two actors deepened as Wayne became increasingly frustrated with how Eastwood represented heroism on-screen.

John Wayne approached his many Westerns as an opportunity to uphold and promote his staunch conservative beliefs about America. From his perspective, Clint Eastwood undid all that hard work by painting characters in shades of gray rather than the stark contrast of black and white or good versus evil. In short, John Wayne perceived his battle against Clint Eastwood as a changing of the guard, and he fought bitterly hard to maintain what he perceived as the purity of heroism in the Old West.

Why Did John Wayne Hate Clint Eastwood?

A Changing of the Guard is Never Easy

John Wayne and director John Ford defined the 20th-century Western during their incredible run together. Their films often featured heroes with a rugged charm and a morally direct way of approaching situations. To be sure, this duo did not shy away from the complexities of the Old West. Fort Apache was commendable for being the first film to change the representation of Indigenous peoples in Westerns. But Wayne wanted to idolize the pioneering of the West, and his view of those pioneers began to feel out of touch with the reality of that rough-and-tumble historical period.

Clint Eastwood’s Westerns, on the other hand, presented a darker view of the Old West. Outlaw Josey Wales, for example, is about a Confederate soldier who is betrayed by the Union after the Civil War and fights his war for revenge. In Sergio Leone’s Dollars trilogy, Eastwood portrays a bounty hunter out for gold, who only happens to intervene when such an act coincides with his own ends. Even when Eastwood’s films didn’t address these themes directly, the undercurrent remained.

John Wayne was opposed to such a view of heroism and saw it as a depart

ure from the family-focused cinema he advocated. The more Eastwood’s star eclipsed his own, the more these ideas grew and the angrier Wayne got. As the Western genre found itself redefined by a series of revisionists and continued to capture the heart of filmgoers, it was more apparent than ever that a new generation of Americans preferred a grittier, darker, and unforgiving depiction of the Old West to Wayne’s romantic idealization.

Advertisement

High Plains Drifter Set Wayne Against Eastwood

Wayne’s Criticism Was His Way of Declining a Project

High Plains Drifter was the flash point of Clint Eastwood and John Wayne’s feud. The film follows a mysterious drifter and gun-fighter played by Eastwood, who finds himself hired by a town to defend its community against three particularly violent outlaws. The thing is, Eastwood’s “hero” is just as dark and vicious (if not more so) than the outlaws. The specific kind of justice Eastwood’s Stranger delivers to the town is teased as being akin to hell.

John Wayne was a traditionalist in nature. He valued God and country and even converted to Catholicism shortly before his death. He deeply resented and was disgusted by Eastwood’s character in High Plains Drifter and even went so far as to write a scathing letter. He sent it to Eastwood, stating, “[High Plains Drifter] wasn’t really about the people who pioneered the West.”

In Eastwood’s defense, he wasn’t trying to make a film documenting what people were like in the Old West with High Plains Drifter; instead, he was looking to create a fable. After receiving the letter for Wayne in the mail, Eastwood realized something else as well. Specifically, two generations of Americans were now arguing over what the West was truly like, and neither side understood the other. But there’s something even more shocking to learn about that letter John Wayne sent to Clint Eastwood. It was written in response to Eastwood asking Wayne to star in a picture with him.

Did Eastwood and Wayne Ever Come Close to Working Together?

It Came Closer Than One Would Think

At some point in the early 70s, acclaimed B-movie director Larry Cohen had himself something of a pipe dream. That dream was to get Clint Eastwood and John Wayne together for one film, a Western Cohen was writing titled The Hostiles. To this day, not much is known about the script, but it was said to have focused on a young gambler (to be played by Eastwood) who wins half the estate of an older man (to be portrayed by John Wayne).

Eastwood was impressed enough by the script to option it from Cohen and agreed to try to convince John Wayne to board the project. After sending Wayne the script, the older actor saw the film as nothing more than a continuation of the spaghetti Western style and refused to star in it. So, Eastwood tried again, this time with a revised script. Still no luck. That’s when Wayne sent Eastwood a letter clarifying his refusal while badmouthing High Plains Drifter.

Even after all that, Eastwood sent Wayne the script one last time. When Wayne’s son, Mike, handed it to him while the two men were out sailing, the former superstar gruffly said, “This piece of sh*t again,” and threw the script into the ocean. Eastwood never reached out again, and the closest the two men ever came to working together was when John Wayne teamed up with Eastwood’s frequent director, Don Siegel, for his final screen performance in The Shootist. One day, Eastwood visited the set, and Wayne finally agreed to meet him.

What Does the Feud Between Wayne and Eastwood Represent?

The Last Generation Will Always Struggle to Understand the Next

John Wayne passed away in 1979. Since his passing, Eastwood has taken on the mantle of America’s favorite cowboy without reservation and provided one of the genre’s defining moments with his Academy Award-winning film Unforgiven. Following that monumental release, the Western genre began to sag in popularity, at least in movies. While the genre has thrived on television, cinematic masterpieces are few and far between, and no singular actor has captured an entire generation’s attention as a quintessential gunslinger.

Considering that outcome, maybe there was something to what John Wayne was saying. Perhaps Westerns could truly only thrive in movie theaters by offering audiences escapist thrills and action, not questions about morality. True, Wayne’s politics blinded him from the many redeeming qualities of spaghetti Westerns and their ilk. Having made so many throughout his storied career, perhaps Wayne had tapped into a zeitgeist that no one else could adequately perceive.

That said, Clint Eastwood’s career is nothing short of remarkable. He didn’t restrain himself to only the Western genre, as Wayne did. Instead, Eastwood became the natural evolution of Wayne and his filmography by questioning and re-examining the type of violence that the United States of America was built upon.

Advertisement